Why did Khushboo Patani get angry over Aniruddhacharya’s statement?

Disha Patani’s sister, Khushboo Patani expressed anger over the live-in relationships

Khushboo Patani’s befitting reply to Aniruddhacharya

Have you seen the video of Aniruddhacharya Maharaj in which he is commenting on girls living in live-in relationships?

This video, which has created a storm on social media, has angered many people.

And among these angry people is Disha Patani’s sister and ex-army officer Khushboo Patani!

Uproar over “mouth-murna” comment

Aniruddhacharya Maharaj said in his speech, “Boys bring 25-year-old girls, who come back after having sex with 4-5 places.”

His statement went viral on social media and people criticized it fiercely.

“If he was in front of me…”

Khushboo Patani expressed her anger over Maharaj’s statement and said, “If he was in front of me, I would have explained to him what it means to hit your mouth.

He is anti-national. You should not support such top class scoundrels. All the stupid impotents of this society are following him.”

Why did he not speak about boys?

Khushboo raised an important question – why did Maharaj comment only on girls? She said, “In live-in, there are two partners.

Then why did he not speak about boys? Why these double standards?”

She said that it is not wrong to live with someone before marriage and it is wrong to support such gender-discriminatory ideas.

From a Major to a Fitness Guru

Do you know who Khushboo Patani is? She hails from Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh and is the elder sister of Bollywood actress Disha Patani.

Khushboo served in the Army for 11 years and retired as a Major in 2024.

Now she is working as a fitness trainer, nutritionist, meditation instructor and spiritual healer. She has a huge fan following on social media.

Need for change in society

It was very important for Khushboo to raise this issue. Even today in our society, there are different rules for women and different rules for men.

Women living in live-in relationships are often labelled as characterless, while no such label is put on men.